There are all sorts of assertions that are unsupported. Given the name of the Substack (i.e. shameless) its obvious this isn't impartial journalism (if that even still exists today) its an opinion column. Which is fine, as long as the reader is aware of what they are buying.
I think my readers are clever enough to know when I'm expressing an opinion and when I'm laying out factual information тАФ which, by the way, I make pretty easy to double-check and verify. So sorry to not meet your standards.
No. I was asking for a specific example that I could check, not a general statement mentioned again. Again, can you give me a specific example where Ling is telling a fib?
Is this supposed to be objective journalism? Or are you simply an opinion writer?
Are you suggesting that the facts that Ling cites aren't true? If so, what's your evidence?
There are all sorts of assertions that are unsupported. Given the name of the Substack (i.e. shameless) its obvious this isn't impartial journalism (if that even still exists today) its an opinion column. Which is fine, as long as the reader is aware of what they are buying.
I think my readers are clever enough to know when I'm expressing an opinion and when I'm laying out factual information тАФ which, by the way, I make pretty easy to double-check and verify. So sorry to not meet your standards.
No. I was asking for a specific example that I could check, not a general statement mentioned again. Again, can you give me a specific example where Ling is telling a fib?