10 Comments
User's avatar
тна Return to thread
Justin Ling's avatar

Alright I'm back. Did I miss anything good?

Expand full comment
Mike Young's avatar

Wrapping up. Recess, and final submissions to come.

Expand full comment
Stu's avatar

Whoever the current lawyer is showed that the 'plan' from the 13th just referenced an empty appendix for the details. But he's basically just been going through details of a bunch of documents without really getting anywhere and has been called out for not getting around to actually asking questions. So, not really. But it was interesting to see what was (or wasn't) in the OPS plan that their lawyer referenced. Not that it's very relevant.

Expand full comment
G L's avatar

it was the Government of Canada lawyer

Expand full comment
HL Gazes's avatar

The white-haired guy was GoC? I donтАЩt think IтАЩve seen him before.

Expand full comment
Stu's avatar

Ok, missed that. Makes sense based on what he eventually got around to.

Expand full comment
Justin Ling's avatar

Glad someone brought it up!

Expand full comment
Justin Ling's avatar

The PM certainly seems testier than Ieft him

Expand full comment
HL Gazes's avatar

Now my connection settles down and stops stuttering. All I got was a word or two from both of them and an objection to something the lawyer said. IтАЩll have to find it tonight when they post today and the transcripts.

Does this тАЬplanтАЭ actually exist somewhere?

Has it really been 6 weeks?

Snarky cheers from the peanut gallery after they break. CanтАЩt help themselves I guess.

Expand full comment
Stu's avatar

Yeah, this lawyer's been sort of all over the place looking at specifics of different documents without seeming to have a point. Other lawyers have been annoyed as well.

Expand full comment