The disparity between how you initially presented this to your readers and how it actually happened, now that the details are out, reveal a level of dishonesty on your part that should give your audience pause. Your claim is censorship. But what we ultimately published, by your own description, is a more forceful argument against Israel …
The disparity between how you initially presented this to your readers and how it actually happened, now that the details are out, reveal a level of dishonesty on your part that should give your audience pause. Your claim is censorship. But what we ultimately published, by your own description, is a more forceful argument against Israel than what Paris initially recorded. So where is the censorship?
And I get that you'd prefer to posture and pose as a swashbuckling crusader for raw and fiery discourse in a world where your Jews neighbours are NOT being demonized, ostracized, menaced and brutalized, but sadly, that's not how things are right now. So yeah, I'm pretty careful about not publishing scattershot claims that turn the heat up on Jews, and you should be too.
The disparity between how you initially presented this to your readers and how it actually happened, now that the details are out, reveal a level of dishonesty on your part that should give your audience pause. Your claim is censorship. But what we ultimately published, by your own description, is a more forceful argument against Israel than what Paris initially recorded. So where is the censorship?
And I get that you'd prefer to posture and pose as a swashbuckling crusader for raw and fiery discourse in a world where your Jews neighbours are NOT being demonized, ostracized, menaced and brutalized, but sadly, that's not how things are right now. So yeah, I'm pretty careful about not publishing scattershot claims that turn the heat up on Jews, and you should be too.