You mention nuance and yet don't allow for nuance with arguments from a different angle. Amazing.
You mention that people don't question their right wing narrative, while you refuse to question the official narrative. Amazing.
Let me put it simply. We weren't permitted to question the official narrative. In fact, if you did, you lost your job, you got censored, you got ignored. I'm sorry, but if we don't allow for debate (free speech), how can you expect people to trust the official narrative?
Do you propose we strip all vaccine sceptics of their rights and freedoms simply because they don't accept the official narrative? How far are you willing to go with that?
I just want to warn you, the more you do that to one side, the more likely the other side will do the same and potentially worse. There's a reason why free speech and the right to disagree need to exist. Without them, we end up with nothing short of violence
I agree with you, we need to be able to discuss a subject and allow each other their own opinions, we can agree to disagree without denigrating anyone.
You're correct that I don't dispute facts or question proven things. Calling proven vaccines "a narrative" is just stupidity and every word out of your pie hole just proves what I've said about convoy morons.
Which part of 95% effectiveness was "proven scientific fact"? Or how about the one where they said that those who got the vaccines wouldn't get covid? Was that proven science? Because the proof sure suggests otherwise right now. Even the argument that it reduces serious illness and hospitalization is showing to be rather scant of evidence.
You mention nuance and yet don't allow for nuance with arguments from a different angle. Amazing.
You mention that people don't question their right wing narrative, while you refuse to question the official narrative. Amazing.
Let me put it simply. We weren't permitted to question the official narrative. In fact, if you did, you lost your job, you got censored, you got ignored. I'm sorry, but if we don't allow for debate (free speech), how can you expect people to trust the official narrative?
Do you propose we strip all vaccine sceptics of their rights and freedoms simply because they don't accept the official narrative? How far are you willing to go with that?
I just want to warn you, the more you do that to one side, the more likely the other side will do the same and potentially worse. There's a reason why free speech and the right to disagree need to exist. Without them, we end up with nothing short of violence
I agree with you, we need to be able to discuss a subject and allow each other their own opinions, we can agree to disagree without denigrating anyone.
You're correct that I don't dispute facts or question proven things. Calling proven vaccines "a narrative" is just stupidity and every word out of your pie hole just proves what I've said about convoy morons.
Which part of 95% effectiveness was "proven scientific fact"? Or how about the one where they said that those who got the vaccines wouldn't get covid? Was that proven science? Because the proof sure suggests otherwise right now. Even the argument that it reduces serious illness and hospitalization is showing to be rather scant of evidence.
Hah! Proven scientific facts. That's a good one!
Nothing is ever 100%. Correction, you are a 100% verified moron.
Good cope there, pal. How many times do they have to be wrong for you to realize the truth?