1. Even those who think of as the blackest form of evil can do good AI smartass correction, when changing 'who' to 'we' works perfectly well (but may not mean what you intended !): Even those who are thought of as the epitome of evil are capable of doing good. 2. Are we better off with Rowling as an enemy? (As opposed to, say, an abstent…
1.
Even those who think of as the blackest form of evil can do good
AI smartass correction, when changing 'who' to 'we' works perfectly well (but may not mean what you intended !):
Even those who are thought of as the epitome of evil are capable of doing good.
2.
Are we better off with Rowling as an enemy? (As opposed to, say, an abstentions.)
This looks like a Google autocorrect error to me.
Are we better off having Rowling as an enemy, rather than as someone who abstains from taking a stance?
3.
, at times, argue that the trans community presents and existential threat to feminism.
OK, just a typo.
4.
And they stems from a fundamentally earnest place
Again, simple typo
4.
But, then, why wasn’t there those critical voices?
This one just sounded bad, to me, not actually incorrect usage,
but the AI picked it up so I include it.
AI suggested
But then, why weren't there any critical voices?"
I prefer (irrelevantly):
But, then, where were those critical voices?
I'm flabbergasted that with the quantity of virtually perfect copy you produce daily you would take the time to read this! Thanks and thanks again.